Nitehawk Army/Military Patrol Black Leather Combat Boots Outdoor Cadet Security
Price: | £29.99£29.99
&
Free Returns on some sizes and colours
|
- Strong and durable Nitehawk lace-up combat boots. Lightweight and comfortable. Hard wearing and long lasting
- Padded tongue and suede collar. EVA removable insole
- Outer Material: Leather, Suede
- Sole: Rubber
- Closure: Lace-Up
- Heel Type: Block Heel
- Shoe Width: Medium
- Steel shank within sole designed to reduce fatigue on the wearers feet
- Slip and oil resistant sole
- 50/50 nylon/leather. Gum rubber sole
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- Item Weight : 2 Kilograms
- Date First Available : 19 May 2017
- Manufacturer : Nitehawk
- ASIN : B071LJQTG5
- Manufacturer reference : NH90-3
- Department : Women's
- Best Sellers Rank: 3,169 in Shoes & Bags (See Top 100 in Shoes & Bags)
- 31 in Men's Boots
- Customer reviews:
Product description
The Nitehawk® genuine black leather patrol boots are affordable and ideal for military, army cadets, police, hunting, airsoft, paintball, hunting, hiking, tactical sports and anything else that will require a hard wearing and long lasting boot. These boots have a steel shank within the sole to reduce fatigue on the wearers feet. The sole is made from a hard wearing PU rubber which is oil and sleep resistant, giving you the grip you need. EVA insole that is removable. Padded tongue and suede collar giving you added comfort. Available sizes - UK 3 - UK 13.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
Top reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

By kevin todd on 2 September 2017


By Jacob on 1 August 2021

